Congenital abnormalities and anatomic variants of the pancreas (CAAVPs) are not uncommon and appear in a variety of ways . Although many CAAVPs are incidentally detected due to the increasing accessibility of diagnostic imaging, some of them may present with symptoms, ranging from abdominal pain to pancreatitis . It is important to recognize symptomatic CAAVPs because they can be corrected by surgery or interventional procedure [1, 3]. In addition, CAAVPs can affect surgical planning . Therefore, radiologists must be familiar with CAAVPs to correctly diagnose them.
Computed tomography (CT) is relatively inexpensive and accessible, and preferentially used to evaluate the pancreas. Contrast-enhanced CT for the pancreas is performed 35–45 sec (pancreatic phase) and 60–70 sec (portal venous phase) after the start of IV injection of contrast material and uses thin sections for detailed characterization. The pancreatic parenchyma shows peak enhancement on the pancreatic phase . Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) reveals a clearer contrast to the soft tissue than CT. In particular, the pancreatic tissue shows a characteristic high signal intensity on the fat suppressed T1-weighted image . In addition, MRI is more valuable for imaging children because of the absence of radiation exposure. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is useful for evaluation of the pancreatic duct.
In the fourth week of the embryonic period, ventral and dorsal outpouchings arise at the junction of the foregut and midgut. The dorsal pancreatic bud arises from the dorsal outpouching, whereas the ventral pancreatic bud develops from the ventral one, which is also the primordium of the liver and biliary system (Figure 1A and 1B) [3, 7]. As the stomach rotates, the duodenum rotates to the right and becomes C-shaped. Then, the ventral pancreas moves backwards and lies beneath and behind the dorsal pancreas, eventually merging with the dorsal pancreas at 37 fetal days [2, 7]. The ventral pancreas becomes the uncinate process and the lower part of the pancreatic head, and the remainder of the pancreas is derived from the dorsal pancreas (Figure 1C). After fusion, ducts in the dorsal and ventral pancreas meet to form the major duct (duct of Wirsung) [2, 7]. The major duct opens to the duodenum via the major papilla with the common bile duct. The duct in the upper head portion arising from the dorsal pancreas becomes the duct of Santorini, opening through the minor papilla to the duodenum (Figure 1D) .
Pancreas divisum is the most common pancreatic congenital anomaly, and an autopsy series reported the prevalence as high as 14% . This anomaly arises from failed fusion of the dorsal and ventral pancreatic ducts, resulting in two pancreatic ducts that are not joined together but separated and incompletely joined by very thin connections (Figure 2A). As a result, the dorsal pancreatic duct opens to the duodenum via the minor papilla. On MRCP, the common bile duct and the main pancreatic duct are crossed, the so-called ‘crossing duct sign’ (Figure 2B) . In patients with pancreas divisum, exocrine secretory flow may produce through the duct of Santorini, more frequently resulting in recurrent pancreatitis. Some of them may have a Santorinicele (Figure 3) [1, 2].
Annular pancreas refers to as an anomaly in which the pancreatic tissue encircles the second portion of the duodenum . The pancreatic tissue around the duodenum continues with the pancreatic head (Figure 4A) . Annular pancreas is the second most common congenital anomaly of the pancreas, occurring in 1/20000 persons of the general population [2, 9]. During embryonic development, the ventral pancreatic bud is composed of a right and left bud, and the left one normally disappeared. Annular pancreas is thought to be caused by adhesion of the right ventral bud to the duodenum or persistence of the left ventral bud [3, 7]. The clinical manifestations of annular pancreas vary from congenital anomaly to malignancy [7, 10]. Annular pancreas is easily detected on both CT and MRI (Figures 4 and 5) . Surgical resection is needed in symptomatic patients .
Dorsal pancreas agenesis is an uncommon anomaly that manifests as the absence of the body and tail of pancreas. This anomaly results from the absence of the dorsal pancreatic bud. Because most of the islet cells are located in the dorsal pancreas, dorsal pancreas agenesis is linked with diabetes mellitus . Partial dorsal pancreas agenesis, also called short pancreas, is occasionally part of heterotaxy syndrome (Figure 6) . It may be difficult to differentiate dorsal pancreas agenesis from fatty replacement of the distal pancreas, but the presence of stomach or intestine in the distal pancreatic bed and absence of the dorsal pancreatic duct favor a diagnosis of dorsal pancreas agenesis (Figures 7 and 8) .
Heterotopic pancreas occurs in 0.6%–13.7% of the general population and is defined as pancreatic tissue separated from the normal pancreas . Although the aberration of the normal developmental process associated with heterotopic pancreas is unknown, the most widely accepted hypothesis is misplacement of pancreatic tissue . The most common location of heterotopic pancreas is the proximal gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The stomach is concerned in 26–38%, the duodenum in 28–36%, and the jejunum in 16% . On CT images, heterotopic pancreas usually measures less than 2 cm, and it can be misdiagnosed as a small submucosal tumor of the GI tract. Kim et al.  reported that CT findings useful for differentiation of heterotopic pancreas from gastrointestinal stromal tumor or leiomyoma in the stomach or duodenum are an ill-defined border, prominent enhancement of overlying mucosa, endoluminal growth pattern, prepyloric antrum or duodenal location, and flat shape (Figure 9). Malignant neoplasm or inflammation can develop from heterotopic pancreatic tissue (Figures 10 and 11) [7, 12, 15].
Pancreatic tissue can encase the portal vein or superior mesenteric vein (instead of the duodenum as in annular pancreas), and this anomaly is termed circumportal pancreas . It is not rare and has a prevalence of 1.1% to 2.5% (Figure 12). Although the exact developmental mechanism of circumportal pancreas has not been elucidated, it is thought to result from abnormal fusion of the dorsal and ventral pancreatic buds . Patients with this anomaly are usually asymptomatic, but it is clinically important to recognize circumportal pancreas prior to pancreatic surgery because its presence can change surgical planning or cause unexpected complications such as fistula formation [4, 17]. Circumportal pancreas can be classified into the following four subtypes according to the course of the main pancreatic duct and the relationship between the splenic vein and the fused pancreas: 1) anteportal suprasplenic, 2) retroportal suprasplenic, 3) anteportal infrasplenic, and 4) retroportal infrasplenic .
An accessory spleen is an anatomical variation frequently observed in daily practice . They result from failed fusion of the splenic precursors in the dorsal mesogastrium during the fifth week of embryogenesis . Although most accessory spleens are located around the splenic hilum, approximately 16% are found in or around the pancreas . An accessory spleen shows a similar signal intensity and enhancement compared with the mother spleen on MRI (Figure 13A and 13B) . Radio-uptake on Tc-99m heat-damaged red blood cell scintigraphy can diagnose an accessory spleen without pathologic confirmation (Figure 13C) . Rarely, an epithelial or epidermoid cyst can develop from an intrapancreatic accessory spleen (Figure 14) [19, 21].
CAAVPs are not uncommon. Many affected patients remain asymptomatic. However, some patients could present with symptom such as pancreatitis. In addition, CAAVPs can lead to unnecessary surgeries or unexpected complications. Familiarity with the imaging findings of various CAAVPs is paramount for managing patients in daily practice.
CAAVPs = Congenital abnormalities and anatomic variants of the pancreas
CT = Computed tomography
GI = Gastrointestinal
MRI = Magnetic resonance imaging
MRCP = Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors. This work was supported by the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund.
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
Yu, J, Turner, MA, Fulcher, AS and Halvorsen, RA. Congenital anomalies and normal variants of the pancreaticobiliary tract and the pancreas in adults: Part 2, Pancreatic duct and pancreas. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2006; 187(6): 1544–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.0774
Türkvatan, A, Erden, A, Türkoğlu, MA and Yener, Ö. Congenital variants and anomalies of the pancreas and pancreatic duct: imaging by magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography and multidetector computed tomography. Korean Journal of Radiology. 2013; 14(6): 905–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2013.14.6.905
Tadokoro, H, Takase, M and Nobukawa, B. Development and congenital anomalies of the pancreas. Anatomy Research International. 2011; 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/351217
Connelly, TM, Sakala, M and Tappouni, R. Circumportal pancreas: A review of the literature and image findings. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2015; 37(5): 431–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1436-5
Lu, D, Vedantham, S, Krasny, RM, Kadell, B, Berger, WL and Reber, HA. Two-phase helical CT for pancreatic tumors: Pancreatic versus hepatic phase enhancement of tumor, pancreas, and vascular structures. Radiology. 1996; 199(3): 697–701. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.199.3.8637990
Mitchell, D, Vinitski, S, Saponaro, S, Tasciyan, T, Burk, D, Jr and Rifkin, MD. Liver and pancreas: Improved spin-echo T1 contrast by shorter echo time and fat suppression at 1.5 T. Radiology. 1991; 178(1): 67–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.178.1.1984328
Mortelé, KJ, Rocha, TC, Streeter, JL and Taylor, AJ. Multimodality imaging of pancreatic and biliary congenital anomalies. Radiographics. 2006; 26(3): 715–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.263055164
Li, Y-L, Yu, M-L and Lee, K-H. The crossing duct sign. Abdominal Radiology. 2018; 43(6): 1506–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1312-3
Kim, H-J, Kim, M-H, Lee, S-K, et al. Normal structure, variations, and anomalies of the pancreaticobiliary ducts of Koreans: a nationwide cooperative prospective study. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2002; 55(7): 889–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1067/mge.2002.124635
Zyromski, NJ, Sandoval, JA, Pitt, HA, et al. Annular pancreas: Dramatic differences between children and adults. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2008; 206(5): 1019–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.12.009
Karcaaltincaba, M. CT differentiation of distal pancreas fat replacement and distal pancreas agenesis. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2006; 28(6): 637–41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-006-0151-7
Rezvani, M, Menias, C, Sandrasegaran, K, Olpin, JD, Elsayes, KM and Shaaban, AM. Heterotopic pancreas: Histopathologic features, imaging findings, and complications. Radiographics. 2017; 37(2): 484–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2017160091
Kim, DW, Kim, JH, Park, SH, et al. Heterotopic pancreas of the jejunum: Associations between CT and pathology features. Abdominal Imaging. 2015; 40(1): 38–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0177-y
Kim, JY, Lee, JM, Kim, KW, et al. Ectopic pancreas: CT findings with emphasis on differentiation from small gastrointestinal stromal tumor and leiomyoma. Radiology. 2009; 252(1): 92–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2521081441
Tison, C, Regenet, N, Meurette, G, et al. Cystic dystrophy of the duodenal wall developing in heterotopic pancreas: Report of 9 cases. Pancreas. 2007; 34(1): 152–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mpa.0000246669.61246.08
Leyendecker, JR and Baginski, SG. Complete pancreatic encasement of the portal vein (circumportal pancreas): Imaging findings and implications of a rare pancreatic anomaly. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography. 2008; 32(1): 61–4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/rct.0b013e3180557448
Tappouni, R, Perumpillichira, J, Sekala, M, Hosseinzadeh, K, Clark, C and Leyendecker, J. Circumportal pancreas: Imaging findings in 40 patients. Abdominal Imaging. 2015; 40(3): 521–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0242-6
Freeman, JL, Jafri, S, Roberts, JL, Mezwa, DG and Shirkhoda, A. CT of congenital and acquired abnormalities of the spleen. Radiographics. 1993; 13(3): 597–610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.13.3.8316667
Kim, SH, Lee, JM, Han, JK, et al. Intrapancreatic accessory spleen: Findings on MR Imaging, CT, US and scintigraphy, and the pathologic analysis. Korean Journal of Radiology. 2008; 9(2): 162–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2008.9.2.162
Halpert, B and Györkey, F. Lesions observed in accessory spleens of 311 patients. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 1959; 32(2): 165–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/32.2.165