Hemangioma is the most common benign hepatic tumor, usually diagnosed without difficulty due to typical imaging features. However, atypical features of hepatic hemangiomas including fluid-fluid level have been reported [1, 2, 3]. When these uncommon findings are combined with extremely slow or no contrast enhancement on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), differentiation from other cystic lesions, such as complicated cysts, mucinous cystic neoplasm, or even metastases with hemorrhage or necrosis may be impossible [1, 4].
We present a case of hepatic hemangiomas with fluid-fluid levels on CT and MRI that was further evaluated with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CE-US).
A 57-year-old man was admitted for elevated liver enzymes and carbohydrate antigen 19–9. On contrast-enhanced CT, there were rounded, non-enhancing cystic lesions in liver segments four, five, and seven (Figure 1). Each lesion showed fluid-fluid levels with the lower layer of slightly higher density relative to the upper layer. On MRI, all lesions appeared cystic, showing T2 bright and T1 low signal intensity (SI), and with a fluid-fluid level. The lower layer showed T2 intermediate low and T1 subtle high SI relative to the upper layer. On gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI, none of the lesions showed contrast enhancement, and there were signal defects on hepatobiliary phase imaging (Figure 2). The possibility of hemorrhagic cysts seemed to be most likely. However, unusual metastasis with hemorrhagic necrosis or cystic changes could not be excluded.
Accordingly, ultrasound-guided biopsy was planned. In contrast to CT or MRI findings, ultrasound revealed that all lesions appeared solid with homogenous hyperechogenicity. CE-US revealed very slow peripheral nodular enhancement and complete fill-in, and without washout on delayed-phase (Figure 3). These findings were suggestive of hepatic hemangioma. Nevertheless, biopsy was performed, and pathology confirmed the diagnosis of cavernous hemangioma.
Fluid-fluid level may be detected when a lesion contains substances of different densities in a cystic or confined space. This feature, caused by the sedimentation effect, has been reported in several hepatic lesions, such as complicated cysts, mucinous cystic neoplasm, or metastases with cystic, hemorrhagic, or necrotic changes . Fluid-fluid levels in hepatic hemangiomas have rarely been reported [1, 2, 3, 5], yet are usually not considered in the differential diagnosis with a hepatic lesion containing fluid-fluid level.
Several reports [1, 2, 3] proposed that hepatic hemangiomas with extremely slow or stagnant blood flow may show fluid-fluid level with sedimentation of red blood cells in the inferior layer and serum in the superior layer. On CT, the upper layer shows fluid attenuation due to serum, while the lower shows slightly higher attenuation due to packed red blood cells. On MRI, the top layer shows fluid SI of T2 bright and T1 low SI, while the lower layer shows relatively lower T2 and slightly higher T1 SI, due to cellular content. In previous reports [2, 3] hepatic hemangiomas with fluid-fluid levels showed typical enhancement pattern of a hemangioma, facilitating the diagnosis. However, in our case, there was no evidence of any contrast enhancement on CT or MRI, thus complicating the final diagnosis.
Ghai et al.  suggested that multiple interfaces resulting from vascular channels of the hemangioma increase the background echogenicity on ultrasound and interfere with the visualization of a fluid-fluid level. This may explain the discrepancy between the demonstration of a fluid-fluid level between ultrasound and other modalities. On CE-US, hepatic hemangioma shows the same typical enhancement pattern as on CT or MRI. About 40–50% of hepatic hemangiomas show complete fill-in during the late phase, which is considered diagnostic regardless of the B-mode appearance . CE-US has advantages for its real-time operation and ability to observe the enhancement process in continuous time frame.
CE-US may contribute to the final diagnosis of an atypical hepatic hemangioma with fluid-fluid levels when the characteristic hemangioma enhancement pattern is not observed on CT or MRI, and further lesion characterization is relevant for further patient management.
This work was supported by the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund.
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
Soyer P, Bluemke DA, Fishman EK, Rymer R. Fluid-fluid levels within focal hepatic lesions: Imaging appearance and etiology. Abdominal Imaging. 1998; 23: 161–165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002619900312
Ghai S, Dill-Macky M, Wilson S, Haider M. Fluid-fluid levels in cavernous hemangiomas of the liver: Baffled? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184: S82–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.184.3_supplement.01840s82
Lee J, Lim HK, Jeon YH. Multiple hepatic hemangiomas with fluid-fluid levels. Australas Radiol. 2007; 51 Suppl: B310–312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1673.2007.01801.x
Sommer WH, Zech CJ, Bamberg F, et al. Fluid-fluid level in hepatic metastases: A characteristic sign of metastases of neuroendocrine origin. Eur J Radiol. 2012; 81: 2127–2132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.09.012
Obata S, Matsunaga N, Hayashi K, Ohtsubo M, Morikawa T, Takahara O. Fluid-fluid levels in giant cavernous hemangioma of the liver: CT and MRI demonstration. Abdom Imaging. 1998; 23: 600–602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002619900411
Lee JY, Choi BI, Han JK, Kim AY, Shin SH, Moon SG. Improved sonographic imaging of hepatic hemangioma with contrast-enhanced coded harmonic angiography: Comparison with MR imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2002; 28: 287–295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-5629(01)00511-7